Open research · negative results published

We Test the Folklore Against the Record

Crypto runs on folklore: extreme fear is a buy, high funding means a flush, altseason follows dominance breaks. We have the recorded history to check, so we do, in public. Each note states the question, the data, the method and the result. When the answer is "no edge", we publish that too; honest negatives are rarer and more useful than hopeful positives.

01

Research notes

001 · Do extreme readings predict the next week?rec · recomputed daily

Five gauges, eight years of records, one narrow question. Mostly no, with two honest exceptions. Live tables.

Read the note
02

The rules every note follows

  • The question is stated before the data is looked at, and the note answers that question, not a prettier one.
  • Only recorded, dated series are used: the same daily archive the rest of this site runs on, never reconstructed history.
  • Base rates always appear next to conditional results, and buckets thinner than 30 days are suppressed.
  • Negative results are published with the same prominence as positive ones.
  • Every note links the CC0 dataset and the exact API calls needed to reproduce it.